An unusual theory regarding the emergence of modern humanity has been promoted for many years and is occasionally addressed by enthusiasts. A major source of this theory is Sitchen who has drawn it from his learned interpretation of ancient scriptures.
As the story goes an advanced alien society on planet X passes this way every few millennia. They established a presence on Earth motivated by the need to acquire gold. Their presence occurs in the earliest scriptures and is commented on. In order to mine the gold, they chose to upgrade a species of humanoid into modern humanity.
This first is an extraordinary claim. After saying that, I observe one other issue. It is a scriptural interpretation based on a Bronze Age assemblage of writings. Care must be exercised before we accept anything beyond the basic ideas themselves because of the introduction of cultural inputs.
It takes no effort to imagine a contact event been written up in the glorious language of a Bronze Age war chief.
If anything, my own work has actually built additional meat on this skeleton.
To start with I have posted on the orbit of the sun through the cluster related to Sirius over a 100,000 year or so cycle. Such a path could easily put us in close contact with an alien civilization each trip. It would also explain why such a planet X might even be possible. So a completely far fetched proposition drawn from controversial scriptural interpretations becomes possible to consider.
I have also additionally posted on the proposition that human ancestors developed a modern population that technically matured over 15,000 years ago during the Ice Age. They decided to end the Ice Age by inducing a crustal shift and executed accordingly. In the process they transitioned to space humanity who we recognize today in the form of ET.
Much of this is supported in scriptural sources and the rest can be built up by inference and physical evidence. It provides a framework that places modern humanity on Earth after been cloned into existence from our primate ancestors at some early point. I find 400 K years as unnecessarily long and completely unsupported in the fossil record, yet it cannot be discounted at all Our fossil record is far too scant.
However, the past twenty thousand years covering the end of the Ice Age works is completely plausible and fills an implied gap in the natural rise of modern humanity. After all if we have done everything inside of 10,000 years, what were we doing for the previous 70 K at least?
For all these reasons it becomes plausible that the conversion of our primate precursors to modern humanity may have been accelerated as early as three to five orbital cycles ago or as much as 500,000 years ago. All evidence would be buried in the tropics and be very deep. I prefer to accept that the rise of humanity was unaided and to some degree the fossil record supports that interpretation. Yet the repopulation of the Earth after the crustal shift is recent and was surely done by humans themselves and with any number of local colonies sporting separate racial types.
With this background of interpretation, you are equipped to read this item prepared by Michael Tellinger who is preparing a book on the subject. It has taken myself years to assemble the sources and resolve underlying issues to put together an internally possible history that is not instantly in contravention of physical science and probabilities. So while I am not thrilled to see time pushed back over half a million years when I can get it all done inside the 100,000 years that the fossil record presently gives us, I am also cognizant of the reality that earlier has always proven better.
I underline what I find helpful.
The idea that humanity was created as a slave to work comes out through the cultural lens of Sumerian Tablets. A better interpretation is that we were engineered to complete the task of terraforming the Earth and that is the purpose we live for. If in fact we caused the crust to shift, then we are well on the way to completing the task. I am also not convinced that the gold aspect of the tale I anything more than a cultural artifact.
Here is another edition of my weekly article series. We explore evidence of genetic manipulation of the earliest humans. I will keep the articles as fresh and up to date with the latest scientific discoveries as possible. I hope to point out to you where this new information is slipping through the cracks of mainstream scholars and academics, while it supports many of the so-called outlandish theories about our human origins. Enjoy the read and please register your friends that may also have similar interests at the end of the article.
Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past?
The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup. Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons - sections that carry some sort of genetic code. The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified. These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA.
This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution. Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case. Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species. Fruit Fly 21 000; Zebrafish 50 000; Chicken 76 000; Mouse 81 000; Chimp 130 000; Human 68 000.
Can you see the problem here? The Chimp is supposed to be our closest known genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans. New research has revealed that Dolphin DNA is very closely related to humans. This will not be surprising to those who have studied the work of Drumvalo Malchiezedek.
But then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.
In April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that "A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest "gene deserts" known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes" as reported in Nature. It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.
So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 445 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the "Tree of life" to trim the ability of the new "creature" and how they struggled to make the perfect "primitive worker" so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence. Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu.
• Ya Sin: "Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?"
• The Believers - God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. "We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…"
Laws of Manu:
• 19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
• 20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.
Notice the reference to "We" by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or "lulu amelu" suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this "fusion" of our chromosome 2, is what makes us human.
Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.
Please click here to share my articles with your friends who you know will appreciate them.