This is a little unexpected. It is not unexpected that dust is a contributor but the magnitude certainly is. It appears that two thirds of the regional temperature gain can be attributed to dust and volcanic ash.
This also clarifies the feedback mechanism. We forget the heat gathering capacity of ocean water as compared to land because is attenuated through a thick upper layer. Land either absorbs and uses the energy chemically or reflects it back into the atmosphere. Thus the ocean has a stable temperature regime whose variation is minor as remarked on here. However a one degree rise represents a major jump in heat content in the water that will discharge into the atmosphere producing storms.
A modest amount of dust in the atmosphere generated major reduction in the driving heat engine.
The clear lesson is that a major volcanic interlude will be felt strongly in terms of climate change.
This returns me to contemplation on the possible causes of the worst climate experiences of the little ice age.
Assuming that we were on the low end of the normal Holocene climate variation, the injection of volcanic dust would have been rather damaging. And it need not be a overly big event. I recall that Fuji erupted in a timely manner and its position is such as to possibly affect European climate through high level aerosols and dust.
Thus provided that we already had a modest reduction is temperature due to a very slightly cooler sun, an inconvenient volcano could easily wreck a years climate while not even been noticed.
Dust Responsible for Most of Atlantic Warming
posted: 26 March 2009 02:15 pm ET
The warming of Atlantic Ocean waters in recent decades is largely due to declines in airborne dust from African deserts and lower volcanic emissions, a new study suggests.
Since 1980, the tropical North Atlantic has been warming by an average of a half-degree Fahrenheit (a quarter-degree Celsius) per decade.
While that number may sound small, it can translate to big impacts on hurricanes, which are fueled by warm surface waters, said study team member Amato Evan of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. For example, the ocean temperature difference between 1994, a quiet hurricane year, and 2005's record-breaking year of storms (including Hurricane Katrina), was just 1 degree Fahrenheit.
Evan and his colleagues had previously shown that African dust and other airborne particles can suppress hurricane activity by reducing how much sunlight reaches the ocean and keeping the sea surface cool. Dusty years predict mild hurricane seasons, while years with low dust activity — including 2004 and 2005 — have been linked to stronger and more frequent storms.
In the new study, the researchers investigated the exact effect of dust and volcanic emissions on ocean temperatures. They combined satellite data of dust and other particles with existing climate models and calculated how much of the Atlantic warming observed during the last 26 years could be accounted for by simultaneous changes in African dust storms and tropical volcanic activity, primarily the eruptions of El Chichón in Mexico in 1982 and Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991.
The results: More than two-thirds of this upward trend in recent decades can be attributed to changes in African dust storm and tropical volcano activity during that time.
This was a surprisingly large amount, Evan said.
The results, detailed in the March 27 issue of the journal Science, suggest that only about 30 percent of the observed Atlantic temperature increases are due to other factors, such as a warming climate.
"This makes sense, because we don't really expect global warming to make the ocean [temperature] increase that fast," Evan said.
This adjustment brings the estimate of global warming's impact on the Atlantic more in line with the smaller degree of ocean warming seen elsewhere, such as the Pacific.
Of course, this doesn't discount the importance of global warming, Evan said, but indicates that newer climate models will need to include dust storms as a factor to accurately predict how ocean temperatures will change.
Satellite research of dust-storm activity is relatively young, and no one yet understands what drives dust variability from year to year. And volcanic eruptions are still relatively unpredictable.
"We don't really understand how dust is going to change in these climate projections, and changes in dust could have a really good effect or a really bad effect," Evan said.
More research and observations of the impact of dust will help answer that question.