Super Nova Fizzle

Having a somewhat vague understanding of the mathematics of the so called Black Hole and having monitored the development of particle physics for over forty years, it is somewhat bemusing to see that they are unable to generate a super nova in their modeling.  This is a somewhat fundamental test of theory if one is modeling gravitational collapse.

The first elementary flaw is that mathematical continuity fails in both the direction of collapse but also far sooner on the orthogonal plane.  Yet the work done is in one dimension only, naturally assuming perfect orthogonal continuity.

I also am able to make the unusual conjecture that at the event horizon and interior to the event horizon, the particles degenerate into photonic energy and in the process carry off most if not all of the related gravitational potential. You are welcome to prove this conjecture wrong.

Thus a super nova is a photon blast whose photons then mostly reform back into particles a long ways away as local curvature drops off.

I could be wrong of course.  It is just that the longer a famous old theory lies around the less it appears to be doubted.  Forty years ago, everyone avoided black holes because they all knew it was the result of mathematical perfection (and sole solvability) and thus had little likelihood of appearing in nature quite like the math shows.  It did show where our theory broke down decisively.

As usual their modeling is declaring that modern theory is conforming to GIGO. 

Why Won't the Supernova Explode?

January 7, 2010: A massive old star is about to die a spectacular death. As its nuclear fuel runs out, it begins to collapse under its own tremendous weight. The crushing pressure inside the star skyrockets, triggering new nuclear reactions, setting the stage for a terrifying blast. And then... nothing happens.

At least that's what supercomputers have been telling astrophysicists for decades. Many of the best computer models of supernova explosions fail to produce an explosion. Instead, according to the simulations, gravity wins the day and the star simply collapses.

Clearly, physicists are missing something.

"We don't really understand how supernovas of massive stars work yet," says Fiona Harrison, an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology. The death of relatively small stars is better understood, but for larger stars — those with more than about 9 times the mass of our sun — the physics just doesn't add up.

Right: A supercomputer model of a rapidly-spinning, core-collapse supernova. NuSTAR observations of actual supernova remnants will provide vital data for such models and help explain how massive supernovas manage to explode. Credit: Fiona Harrison/Caltech. [larger image]

Something must be helping the outward push of radiation and other pressures overcome the inward squeeze of gravity. To figure out what that "something" is, scientists need to examine the inside of a real supernova while it's exploding — not a particularly easy thing to do!

But that's exactly what Harrison intends to do with a new space telescope she and her colleagues are developing called the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, or NuSTAR.

After it launches in 2011 aboard a Pegasus rocket, NuSTAR will give scientists an unprecedented view of high-energy X-rays coming from supernova remnants, black holes, blazars, and other extreme cosmic phenomena. NuSTAR will be the first space telescope that can actually focus these high-energy X-rays, producing images roughly 100 times sharper than those possible with previous telescopes.

Using NuSTAR, scientists will look for clues to conditions inside the exploding star etched into the pattern of elements spread throughout the nebula that remains after the star explodes.

Above: An artist's concept of NuSTAR. Focusing X-ray optics require long focal lengths--hence the 10-meter deployable mast, which is extended after launch. [larger image] [more]

"You don't get the opportunity to watch these explosions very often, ones that are close enough to study in detail," Harrison says. "What we can do is study the remnants. The composition and distribution of the material in the remnants tells you a lot about the explosion."

One element in particular is of keen interest: titanium-44. Creating this isotope of titanium through nuclear fusion requires a certain combination of energy, pressure, and raw materials. Inside the collapsing star, that combination occurs at a depth that's very special. Everything below that depth will succumb to gravity and collapse inward to form a black hole. Everything above that depth will be blown outward in the explosion. Titanium-44 is created right at the cusp.

So the pattern of how titanium-44 is spread throughout a nebula can reveal a lot about what happened at that crucial threshold during the explosion. And with that information, scientists might be able to figure out what's wrong with their computer simulations.

Right: NuSTAR will map the distribution of titanium-44 in supernova remnants like this one, Cassiopeia A, to search for evidence of asymmetries. Image Credit: Chandra X-ray Observatory. [more]

Some scientists believe the computer models are too symmetrical. Until recently, even with powerful supercomputers, scientists have only been able to simulate a one-dimensional sliver of the star. Scientists just assume that the rest of the star behaves similarly, making the simulated implosion the same in all radial directions.

But what if that assumption is wrong?

"Asymmetries could be the key," Harrison says. In an asymmetrical collapse, outward forces could break through in some places even if the crush of gravity is overpowering in others. Indeed, more recent, two-dimensional simulations suggest that asymmetries could help solve the mystery of the "non-exploding supernova."

If NuSTAR finds that titanium-44 is spread unevenly, it would be evidence that the explosions themselves were also asymmetrical, Harrison explains.

To detect titanium-44, NuSTAR needs to be able to focus very high energy X-rays. Titanium-44 is radioactive, and when it decays it releases gamma rays with an energy of 68 kilo-electronvolts (keV). Existing X-ray space telescopes, such as NASA's Chandra X-Ray Observatory, can only focus X-rays up to about 15 keV.

Normal lenses can't focus X-rays at all. Glass bends X-rays only a miniscule amount, so for a glass lens to bend X-rays enough to focus them, it would have to be so thick that it would adsorb the X-rays instead.

X-ray telescopes use an entirely different kind of lens. Called a Wolter-I optic, it consists of many cylindrical shells, each one slightly smaller and placed inside the last. The result looks a bit like the layers of a cylindrical onion (if there were such a thing), with small gaps between the layers.

Above: The x-ray "light path" of the EPIC camera of the XMM-Newton satellite, a Wolter-I design similar to that used by NuSTAR. Credit: ESA/ESTEC. [larger image] [more]

Incoming X-rays pass between these layers, which guide the X-rays to the focal surface

It's not a lens, strictly speaking, because the X-rays reflect off the surfaces instead of passing through them the way light passes through a glass lens. But the end result is the same.

NuSTAR's Wolter-I optic has a special atomic-precision coating that enables its layers to reflect X-rays with energies as high as 79 keV. Harrison and her colleagues have spent years perfecting the delicate manufacturing techniques for making these high-precision layers. Together with a new sensor that can tolerate these high energies, these finely crafted layers are what enable NuSTAR to image these relatively unexplored, high-intensity X-rays.

And the discoveries won't stop with supernovas. High-energy X-rays are emitted by many of the universe's most extreme phenomena, including supermassive black holes and blazars. NuSTAR will give us a new window on the universe at its most extreme.

Author: Patrick Barry | Editor: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

No comments:

Post a Comment